Consular

I have opinions to do RL and dont know if I'll be able to add to my proposal along this timeline. Will try though!

I generally absolutely hate like systems but actually like the one on these boards for some reason.

I am opposed to the exclusionary tactics that reduce input of region players just because they don't get 'elected', that is a tactic of the false democracies.
 
 
If they sign up they're in, that is TWP style.

He is upset that I spurned his man-crush.

I asked Alei about it, he referred me to Milograd, Milograd referred me to Pez
 
Pez is Milograd.

That's so Meta

*slams desk into head*

Ahhhhh
 
While I'm flattered that people liked my idea, this gigantic abrupt mess what not entirely what I had in mind! D:
 
I was hoping to slowly work on other parts of my draft over a month, but I guess I'll do it faster now?
 
I suppose events dictate, so onwards.

lacking perfect people the odds seem remote, but I get your point.
 
 
 
I for one will not detail my imperfections because it would detract from my narcissism

Why? The law outlines the responsibilities so there isnt confusion. The name is irrelevant -- you're the one prescribing some meaning to it. PM doesnt necessarily mean anymore than Speaker in and of itself.
 
I don't think the Speaker/whatever should have the ability to change the name unilaterally. It's already noted the Assembly can change its name by a simple vote. There doesn't need to be a bill for that.

This is the section I have so far describing what is usually called the "legislative" area of government. I hesitate to use that term since what I'm proposing doesn't fit a "traditional" model of government at all, but yeah. This essentially combines the Assembly Act, the PM Act (I've used the name Speaker largely because I find the name PM to be uninspired), and elements of the Electoral Act as well. I've left out points on ministries and other elected officials but will add them -- I just need to go to sleep right now and wanted to give people something to chew on for now.
 
Like I attempted to say but failed because I can't spell; bare with me. I'm proposing a system where the Delegate and the Assembly can collectively hold authority and guide the course of the region, without infringing upon each other, through a delicate system of balance and convention which I feel reflects our current de facto way of doing things anyway.

Tweedy is banned as well but we still value his opinion.

Tweedy is banned as well but we still value his opinion.

I wonder why. 

Tweedy is banned as well but we still value his opinion.

Unfortunately I am old enough to have seen them when they first came out.

I don't dislike you Cormac. I just often dislike your ideas, and your general behaviour.
 
 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

But it's more of a challenge when the discussion is spread across 6 topics.
 
You're not one to turn down a challenge, are you?

URAP: I can see you how this must be hard for players who are not used to hardpolitiks or realpolitiks in the game - or who don't Like them.
In TWP you can say almost Anything, as long as you realize you will be held responsible for your words and ideas. The Guardians job is in-game protection of the region. In the forum, they don't hold any specific role unless they do so as everyone else, and their in-forum actions are independent from their guardianship role
So, I explain This as a defense to the guardians system - that has not relationship to the political battle that has been occurring lately.
On the other hand, while I can understand how the political battle going on may be hard or uncomfortable for people, but is a consequence of that freedom to speak openly that the region enjoys. That with thread hijacking makes the forums become quite a hot place to navigate, but honestly entertaining to some - I count myself in it honestly.
My whole point to you would perhaps be to try to ignore the banter if it makes you uncomfortable, and to feel free to get involved in collaborating with the region without getting in the realpolitik, if you may. It can get complicated at times but I asure you is possible.
Cheers my friend!

You could always stop bothering with this drama then and instead go contribute any delicious ideas you have to my project: http://www.westpacific.org/forums/index.php?/topic/1349-dramatic-legal-reform/

You could always stop bothering with this drama then and instead go contribute any delicious ideas you have to my project: http://www.westpacific.org/forums/index.php?/topic/1349-dramatic-legal-reform/

Now, I may have no idea what I'm talking about, but I'm relatively sure this is not what Dark was hoping for.

I don't dislike you Cormac. I just often dislike your ideas, and your general behaviour.
 
 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

It remains my opinion that the coup started years ago, with considerably less outrage. This recent actions by the NPO have just been the realisation of what has existed for a while really. People who express outrage now but not back then are either foolish or being disingenuous.
 
Though that said I'm glad Lazarus won't be having its culture and history forcibly assimilated into another region. Even if I do think Lazarus's current "culture" was designed by the NPO anyway.

no