Mediobogdum

*gulps*

Some, not too little time ago, we had an update on the remaining Ambassadors for TWP had and it seemed as if there were quite a few willing to take on the task, even if the emcumbents were 'old hands'. How many do we need and where are they needed?

Under the current way of doing business it seems not to matter, But why have you excluded Elegarth from the Entry Poll?

All Hail, Darkesia! You know your patient so well

If you do your best to do so, so will we for you

Missing, presumed KIA? Welcome back Sensor - you've been missed.

How much time?

We've got Protectorates and Dominions? What? Who? Where?

Try this for starters. Not sure if there are any more https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=158320

Hero, hero .... So sad that my childhood memories are just that now. Fav pose:

I concur with pushing forward with TWPAF activities. We now seem to have many more nations wanting to be involved, although to be honest, I'm unsure as to how many active troops we have now

Upon reflection, I have withdrawn my original comments.

As I was saying in another forum: http://www.westpacific.org/forums/index.php?/topic/1204-army-ranks/ Thanks for your support Westwind I wholeheartedly support, and formally second this proposed Act.

Presence had been duly noted - good to see you here and welcome

Indeed!

Maybe there wasn't anything wrong with it in the first place?

While the rest of us had our heads in the sand

The more the merrier?

Well done troops!

Is that a euphemism for IE?

The official line is that there will be a scheme to offer training for those who might be interested and who have the potential to be Delegate. Unofficially, I suspect it's to flush out possible usurpers

Sorry, you're both wrong, it was "Ten Green Bottles"

Mediobogdum signing-in once more Nation: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=mediobogdum

It seems as if everything is either simplistic or semantic if it does not concur with your future plans. Your 'revolution' is, by my interpretation of that phrase, hardly gaining the momentum usually associated with its usual definition. You appear to be in as much danger of alienating those you wish to embrace as those you wish to push aside and "assimilate or stomp out". Being less aggressive and more tolerant might provide you with more than the meagre following for your Revolution which you have garnished to date. TWP is not reknowned for its rapid response to change and I would respectfully suggest that a more 'softly, softly, catchee monkey' approach would serve your cause rather better. Your enthusiasm and vigour in trying to implement the sorely needed rejuvination of TWP life and TWPAF are wonderful, and I personally appreciate and admire your efforts. I do not want you to think of me as being overly negative, but my suggestion is, please tread more lightly.

Fascinating graph! Great stuff but in Perstatz's original post he stated: "..... is pleased to see that the number is achievable within a six month span. It is observed that 90 endorsements reaches that number nearly two months faster (my itatics and bold) than by clinging to the endorsement cap..." I calculate, using an SPDR of 140, the number of days to be nearer 32 but who would really mind?