Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, Big Bad Badger said:

Done, sorry for the delay.  Too much beach in my last 96 hours.

 

Also, I have unmasked WonderWoman as a Hall of Nations member after their infiltration of TEP was discovered.

No worries. Thanks! I hope the beach was awesome!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Howdy! I'm wondering if there is any way to restrict voting in polls in elections to Hall of Nations/citizens only? I ask because in the two rounds of elections we have done, folks who have not been masked as citizen/Hall of Nations voted. Yes, I do a count and do not include them in the official results, but frankly, they should not have the ability to vote in those polls in the first place. 

Cheers!

Posted
14 hours ago, Dalimbar said:

Howdy! I'm wondering if there is any way to restrict voting in polls in elections to Hall of Nations/citizens only? I ask because in the two rounds of elections we have done, folks who have not been masked as citizen/Hall of Nations voted. Yes, I do a count and do not include them in the official results, but frankly, they should not have the ability to vote in those polls in the first place. 

Cheers!

I don't think so.  I think that this was one of the weakness of the poll.  But since it is so damn convenient we just had the Speaker or SaA double check every time.

Posted

I think we might be able to test setting up a voting thread in a password protected area.  However, that just means the speaker will need to message all Hall of Nations members in good standing to give them the password.  And they will still need to verify the votes.  My opinion is that it's not worth the trouble.  

If the Speaker still have to verify, why be forced to do so twice?  Plus, we are a bit pro transparency here.  While I could set it up, I would much prefer not obscuring the view of the election process.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Darkesia said:

I think we might be able to test setting up a voting thread in a password protected area.  However, that just means the speaker will need to message all Hall of Nations members in good standing to give them the password.  And they will still need to verify the votes.  My opinion is that it's not worth the trouble.  

If the Speaker still have to verify, why be forced to do so twice?  Plus, we are a bit pro transparency here.  While I could set it up, I would much prefer not obscuring the view of the election process.

Does this mean that we could cheat and I could win every time?  BADGER COUP! :P

Posted
24 minutes ago, Darkesia said:

I think we might be able to test setting up a voting thread in a password protected area.  However, that just means the speaker will need to message all Hall of Nations members in good standing to give them the password.  And they will still need to verify the votes.  My opinion is that it's not worth the trouble.  

If the Speaker still have to verify, why be forced to do so twice?  Plus, we are a bit pro transparency here.  While I could set it up, I would much prefer not obscuring the view of the election process.

Yeah. I don't like that option. I would rather stick with the Speaker verifying the votes.

Posted

I'm guessing someone got to it already as @Daddy_Jacoby seems to only be a member of the default member group right now.

 

Oh yeah, there is a nice admin audit bar on the right now, it looks like Darkesia got it update for you last night.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...