Dalimbar Posted September 25, 2015 Posted September 25, 2015 So, as far as I can tell, most old and new West Pacificans are interested in moving on from the events of this past week. But what does "moving on" exactly mean? I hold no answers to this question. This is what the Voice is for, in my opinion. I feel that TWP is an organic government, open to change when required. Having had a few days to process what has happened in terms of both the Voice and the Delegacy, do members both inside and outside the Voice feel that changes should be made, and if so, what should be reformed? Does the system of governance in TWP need reforms at all? I hope by the end of this open (and frank) discussion, West Pacificans, both new and old, can come together to find a system which works for the region at large.
Fratellnoir Posted September 27, 2015 Posted September 27, 2015 The main question that needs to be asked is what problem is solved by agreeing a system of governance. Only by identifying and classifying the problem can we strive for a solution.
Eluvatar Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 To me, the object of government is to protect individuals from abuses by more powerful individuals.
punkdaddy Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 I actually think the only problem was URAP. That has been corrected and we're back to business. One can argue that the off-site activity is a problem, but I still maintain we should try an on-site only solution. We keep trying to fix a problem (off-site activity) without understanding why it exists in the first place. And without understanding the problem, you can't recommend a solution that will work, imo. Malviet and Elegarth 2
Elegarth Posted September 28, 2015 Posted September 28, 2015 I Wholeheartedly agree with PD Malviet 1
Papercuts and Skittles Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 Agree with PD, off-site activity has always been a problem in my years here. On-site solution appeals to more users than an off-site solution ever could.
Powerboat_Racer Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 Agree with PD, off-site activity has always been a problem in my years here. On-site solution appeals to more users than an off-site solution ever could. I have seen it too. I agree with PD, we ought to try an on-site solution first, maybe...on-site activity may spur on off-site activity.
Recommended Posts