Elegarth

Since the position is delegate appointed, I believe is forum should be under the office of the delegate, just for order and homogeneity

You guys don't need your nominations seconded btw

As I see Vlagh already did, I'd like to remind all other candidates that as of the moment they accept, they can open platform / campaigning threads in the Voice forum, as usually done.

Arguably true as well. We hit a gray area there. In any case, as I've already said in other posts in the past month, your personal actions on it were not a decision you made, you were just the messenger of orders given by the former delegate, and neither myself, nor should others by the way, consider your actions wrong: you followed the orders given to you by the creator of your position. In my book, the messenger does not carries fault for the message. so whatever was done wrong, it should be attributed to the former delegate. Now well, you can quit the voice, or belong to it. The constitution is the same, same rules, no constitutional convention was done, and is simpler and easier to carry it over...

LOL! Then I'm out

This^.

Scratch that. Since I was nominated and PD has not accepted yet, I'll conditionally accept my nomination. If PD accepts on time, I'll probably remove myself from the election, but if not, then consider my nomination accepted

I'll reply to this during the day, please be patient. However, please note that quoting me and medio out of context is quite distasteful.

Please consider it for now a delegate appointed position. Since I'm not the advocate nor has he expressed his intentions or desired about it, you should and could coordinate it as an in-game delegate appointed office and you should only need to coordinate it with us (Medio as current delegate, me in the future)

I'm afraid you are wrong, since the dissolution was considered not legal, and hence we simply kick started activity again. And the advocate can consider any signed up member as a member as of the date they posted, regardless of when was the list itself updated, simplifying / solving the issue.

You can nominate yourself

You can also just have it as an in-game position under the auspice of the delegate, and it would be un-involved with the off-site government

Since I'm supposed to take over the delegacy soon, and since I consider that at least at first I'll need to both get used and find my way into that seat, I'll decline this time. Thanks Nox!

Sorry!

8, 9, 10: see above 11: making a simple proposal and voting for it, simple majority would suffice

Please remove obsolete Chief Justice tag and mask from Siberian Tigers as per this: http://www.westpacific.org/forums/index.php?/topic/1624-how-in-the-world-am-i-still-chief-justice/

I nominate Punk Daddy

I'm afraid Vlagh is right in this one. While I appreciate any efforts from any members of the Forums, the Voice's threads are for the Advocate and its deputies to decide to change, or to authorize someone else to do it. Is just a matter of respect to the appointed officials. THis does not means that they can't just come and say "Hey admins, please process Elu's request" and that would work, but still, there is a certain order to things that makes sense. You know what I mean?

I think vlagh means the delegates approvals for war and treaties which are part of the charter but Elu removed from this. I overall think this document has many contradictions with the charter's spirit and it borders on being a de-facto overstep on the separation of in-game and off-site... I need to analyze it more.

I Wholeheartedly agree with PD

Why would we need another position for something that is already a duty of the advocate? Seems an unnecessary slot to be filling over and over... I really liked when the previous regional assembly could simply pronounce its own rules depending on the reality of the RA... we should go back to that instead of moving to a more bureaucratic system tbh

Welcome to TWP, TP

Welcome to TWP

Bienvenido a TWP.

If that were my case, Mrs. Elegarth would brain me if DIDN'T planned to wake them up