Powerboat_Racer Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Fellow Voice members of TWP, TWP has not had a functioning judiciary for a very, very long time and as a member of the voice, I would like to see if it would be worthwhile bringing back the judiciary of TWP. Granted, when we did have the judiciary, it was not used very much, but it was there in the event we needed to use the judiciary. New legislation would have to be written (which I am more than willing to undertake), since the judiciary was functioning under another government structure. I think that for a government to function properly, we need a functioning judiciary, no matter if it gets used often or once in a blue moon. Questions, comments, gripes and complaints are welcome of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Badger Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 According to the Charter, we will establish arbitors on a case by case basis as needed. And since it isn't used much that may be a good system. With that being said, debate is a good thing! What was the reasoning for writing the judiciary in this manner when creating the Charter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerboat_Racer Posted October 10, 2015 Author Share Posted October 10, 2015 According to the Charter, we will establish arbitors on a case by case basis as needed. And since it isn't used much that may be a good system. With that being said, debate is a good thing! What was the reasoning for writing the judiciary in this manner when creating the Charter? I will defer this question to one that can answer...since I was not the one that wrote the previous legislation on the judiciary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elegarth Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 The reason was that it was seldom ever required and hence seemed easier to create a system based on need. When we need a judicial thing, we choose someone and deal with it. The rest of the time, we don't need someone sitting in an inactive position Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkesia Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Elegarth hit the nail on the head. Another problem with establishing an office that seldom is used; whomever is appointed falls into inactivity long before they are needed. So in effect, the only activity the judiciary ever saw was appointing new officers of the court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simple country Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 If you need me, I can be the judge in the TWP Judiciary system. I'll probably be bored, but I can do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Called the Vlagh Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 I would serve as an Arbitor if needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerboat_Racer Posted October 11, 2015 Author Share Posted October 11, 2015 The reason was that it was seldom ever required and hence seemed easier to create a system based on need. When we need a judicial thing, we choose someone and deal with it. The rest of the time, we don't need someone sitting in an inactive position Elegarth hit the nail on the head. Another problem with establishing an office that seldom is used; whomever is appointed falls into inactivity long before they are needed. So in effect, the only activity the judiciary ever saw was appointing new officers of the court. Valid points. Would we need to write legislation to make this happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Badger Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Its already in the charter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerboat_Racer Posted October 11, 2015 Author Share Posted October 11, 2015 Its already in the charter. Oh..okay. Will have to refresh my memory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eli Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 when there are no laws to break there is no reason for adjudication seems rather North Pacifican to insist on having judges. Elegarth and Big Bad Badger 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts