Elegarth

Well if you guys / Winni ever need me, just let me know. I can give you my admin credentials anytime. Trust me, however, that I have zero haste haha

Can people with admin experience offer its help in case you guys ever need it?

What is your question exactly Elu? Why what?

Because I'm a character for a man whose name is NOT Elegarth... just saying

Elegarth votes in favor or ratification

The giving and receiving is voluntary. But our recognition of the in-game mechanics also means the recognition of the sitting delegate to use the tools at his/her availability - banjections, WFE, moderation of the RMB - at his/her will to defend the position. If someone wants to take the delegacy, our system allows for it, they would just need to make it so, and it WOULD require a very good coordinated effort or collusion with a guardian - which while unlikely, is not impossible.

Thank you Cormac.

I think that is an awful idea Llamas. No even 25 posts ago you were explaining how you were going to "destroy" this proposal, just a few days after having said you loved it, and now loving it again. Personally this seems to go beyond an opinion change and into approval seeking. I feel it makes you loose credibility, specially since you were strongly defending your already existing proposal not long ago. This is just an opinion, you are obviously free to ignore it, mate

Change and death are the only constants. I wish you the best from the bottom of my heart, WW. One always comes out of those tunnels different, but still oneself. /heartfelt hug

Agreed

But those are isolated cases that would perhaps more easily be handled in a case by case basis I think

And I was just thinking out further ideas

The military may be revisited, as Cormac said. I think that perhaps, if the military is seen more as a part of the Delegate's power, we could set up some way in which the forum government may request the Delegate's militia to perform assistance or help to governments friendly to the forum? Some sort of collaboration, that is both non mandatory for the delegacy nor for the military. What do you think?

To include or integrate some of Dark's comments more strongly, we would probably need to re.visit the text. Or post it and get comments

LOL, you evil

Cormac's proposal is gonna have an updated version soon Vlagh, just for the record.

Agreed

Mine is totally OOC. I just took it IC out of curiosity and I also got Conservative

Question: Last time I discussed it, I may remember (my memory is not that good) that Dark mention the forum gov may have embassies open that the in-game does not, and vice-versa. I thought that reflected on some of the parts you scratched out, Vlagh. Can I have clarification to that? Honest question.

I'll reserve my comments to Llamas changes once he has made a decision on Vlagh's suggestions.

Those are both terrible....

That, PD, is an idea I can totally support. Even in general for not biding things we can run opinion polls and find a way to introduce them into the dynamics of the government

Moderate Your feel that all three principles are important. You take some interest in politics and definitely have opinions. However those opinions may be formed on a case-by-case basis because you lack an overriding commitment to any of the principles. You may sometimes get confused by complex political issues because you can be persuaded by different arguments. Moderates like yourself are important in mediating between others in a parliamentary democracy. If you get involved in politics then you may well be working alongside the pragmatists among Conservatives or Liberals or Socialists depending on your inclinations and circumstances.

Can't see videos embedded in mobile version of the forum

I'll gladly reply to your comments tomorroW morning, with additions or details or specifics as requested