That is true, which is why I quoted from the Judiciary Act:
The Judiciary can only enforce those laws the HGA has created. Removing the Civil Code would leave us with only the BIll of Rights and Obligations, which are not a Codex of law but rather establish the enumerated rights along with obligations that merely reflect game mechanics and rules. It does nothing regarding issues the HGA might find a need for enforcement and/or Judicial action that the community and government feels it needs. Thus I support a Civil Code or Codex of Law.
That being the case, it is still a valid point that political accountability in the Civil Code can be construed to conflict with the Bill or Rights. I would however expect, that any Judiciary would give the Bill of Rights and Obligations as the higher authority than the Civil Code as both a matter of Rights and a matter of precedence.