Jump to content

Liodor

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Liodor reacted to Ktilqr in Issue #433: The Worst Storm To Hit @@NAME@@ Since...Yesterday?   
    Is the last one meant to be Option 5? If so I think that's the one I would go for lol
  2. Like
    Liodor reacted to Tweedy in Issue #433: The Worst Storm To Hit @@NAME@@ Since...Yesterday?   
    Sounds awfully scary!
  3. Like
    Liodor reacted to Drachmaland in Issue #433: The Worst Storm To Hit @@NAME@@ Since...Yesterday?   
    For the record, this is Issue #433: The Worst Storm To Hit @@NAME@@ Since...Yesterday? [Eaischpnaeieacgkque Bhcieaghpodsttditf; ed:Golgothastan]
     
    Let us make clear that Option 3 has a steep adverse effect in the Weather and in the Environmental Beauty — although Eco-Friendliness increases.
    These are the effects of Option 3 tested on a Civil Rights Lovefest with its Freedoms at 75/73/78 (that nation was only fifteen-days old at the time):
    Business Subsidization: 10 → 9
    Defense Forces: 29 → 28
    Eco-Friendliness: 1 → 11
    Environmental Beauty: -43.4 → -61.4
    Godlessness: 25 → 26
    Human Development Index: 57 → 56
    Law Enforcement: 16 → 15
    Lifespan: 10 → 9
    Pacifism: -12 → -10
    Public Healthcare: 10 → 9
    Public Transport: 8 → 7
    Religiousness: -10 → -11
    Safety: 145.826 → 140.32
    Safety from Crime: 37.208 → 35.706
    Toxicity: 35.142 → 56.146
    Unexpected Death Rate: -10 → -9
    Weaponization: 11.791 → 13.293
    Weather: -14 → -34
    Welfare: 29 → 28
     
    Option 2 was selected in an Anarchy with its Freedoms at 80/97/92, in the hopes of its Economy getting stronger; there was no visible effect in the Economy (or the other two Freedoms), but with Economies at the Frightening level it's always difficult to know whether the Economy would get weaker or stronger if it were at a lower level (and to what degree). Same Option 2, at a Corporate Police State nation with 25/99/27 Freedoms, didn't affect Economy either (again, same rationale).
     
    So, summarizing:
    Option 1 is against pro-market. I'd expect Safety to increase — and Taxation too. In your case it most probably won't hurt a well-established 100/100 Economy, but weaker ones might be affected adversely. Option 2 won't hurt the Economy, but I'd expect Safety to decrease — while Taxation increases, too. Option 3 is a very strange one, increasing Eco-Friendliness while hurting Environmental Beauty. Option 4 is the classic Devout-driven decision, increasing Religiousness and Primitiveness. Option 5 decreases Compassion.
×
×
  • Create New...