Rotwood

Some people just want to see the world burn....

Wow. The floor discussion might not show it (thinking of retiring from that debate out of sheer frustration and exhaustion) but your replacement is spot on with how we feel. I know it allows nations to ban the practice, but we believe that is their choice too. Article 5 is the thing that hits home for us, though: The preference here is that it doesn't get to the abortion stage, that the women in question have enough information and foresight to protect themselves in the first place.

I was going to take a no-replacement stance, but given the replacement, we support you. We have noticed that the repeal has opened up a huge can of worms on the floor, but I believe if they were able to see the replacement it might garner support

(OOC sorry for copying this straight from my post on the WAGA thread on this) Mayhaps, at least, if you want a definition for Terminally Ill, a suggestion would be: "A person who is suffering from a life-threatening illness to which there is no present cure, or present cures do not work on the person." Might need to be slightly reworded, but it could cover those which treatment has failed to work on (I.E: their own immune system prevents it, or the nature of their species.