Eluvatar Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Being somewhat new to The West Pacific, I'm a little lost. Why: Seconds ago: Wickedly evil people ejected The Republic of Dominic republic of arms from The West Pacific. Seconds ago: Wickedly evil people ejected The Republic of Sexybeastila from The West Pacific. 6 minutes ago: Wickedly evil people ejected The Republic of BLACKP3OPL3 from The West Pacific. 6 minutes ago: Wickedly evil people ejected The Empire of Mechomia from The West Pacific. 7 minutes ago: Wickedly evil people ejected The Dictatorship of Mark Estates from The West Pacific. I'm just not understanding it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elegarth Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 What is your question exactly Elu? Why what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eluvatar Posted May 13, 2015 Author Share Posted May 13, 2015 Why are these nations being ejected? What's the purpose? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eli Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 some because of offensive slogans and I don't like them, the high influence nations will be next, there is a transition taking place and I am the executioner of the strategy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eluvatar Posted May 13, 2015 Author Share Posted May 13, 2015 I see. What about: 1 minute ago: Wickedly evil people banned The Chocolate Republic of Cluntobone from The West Pacific. 2 minutes ago: Wickedly evil people ejected and banned The Commonwealth of Benjamin Mark from The West Pacific. 17 minutes ago: Wickedly evil people ejected and banned The Commonwealth of States of Glory from The West Pacific. 19 minutes ago: Wickedly evil people ejected and banned The Most Serene Republic of A fish in the sea from The West Pacific. 21 minutes ago: Wickedly evil people ejected and banned The Borderlands of Goblin City from The West Pacific. I'm particularly puzzled by the banning of Benjamin Mark, who is listed as a nation to endorse on the World Factbook Entry as a nation to endorse up to 120... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cormac Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I'm just wondering in what universe I'm more annoying than Llamas... URAP and Darkesia 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eli Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 lol good question, are you goblin city in TWP? Usually slingshots are for banning, so I think we're all just wondering who's getting the axe. I think that was it. took you off the ban list, I figured you'd see why when I did it. *checks cormac for a sense of humor* Darkesia, URAP and Cormac 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cormac Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Oh, I didn't make the connection. I figured it was because I'm annoying because, well, I am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhang Bhang Duc Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I'm just wondering in what universe I'm more annoying than Llamas... Llamas has been sent al-packing (alpaca geddit?). I'll get me coat..... Cormac, URAP and Reçueçn 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reçueçn Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 I see. What about: 1 minute ago: Wickedly evil people banned The Chocolate Republic of Cluntobone from The West Pacific. 2 minutes ago: Wickedly evil people ejected and banned The Commonwealth of Benjamin Mark from The West Pacific. 17 minutes ago: Wickedly evil people ejected and banned The Commonwealth of States of Glory from The West Pacific. 19 minutes ago: Wickedly evil people ejected and banned The Most Serene Republic of A fish in the sea from The West Pacific. 21 minutes ago: Wickedly evil people ejected and banned The Borderlands of Goblin City from The West Pacific. I'm particularly puzzled by the banning of Benjamin Mark, who is listed as a nation to endorse on the World Factbook Entry as a nation to endorse up to 120... All but one of these nations have been removed from the ban-list. (Many thanks on their behalf, and on the behalf of the community. To quote Yy, it takes a village... Could States of Glory be removed as well, please and thank you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ike Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Llamas has been sent al-packing (alpaca geddit?). I'll get me coat..... For what reason? I come back from a vacation to find this madness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
URAP Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 For what reason? I come back from a vacation to find this madness. Llamas has contributed more than his fair share of the madness Westwind and A fish in the sea 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mars Inc. Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 The Rejected Realms is a good region if you're bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
URAP Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 The Rejected Realms is a good region if you're bad.Sigh.This post is unbelievably pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Consular Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Why must everything have a point? It amused me, at least! Elegarth, A fish in the sea, Westwind and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eli Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Ike you'd have been gone too had I remembered your name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
URAP Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Ike you'd have been gone too had I remembered your name.That's Eli for you!XD Darkesia 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ike Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Ike you'd have been gone too had I remembered your name. For what? It seems you banned people over the most trivial reasons. Reminds me of someone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mars Inc. Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Sigh. This post is unbelievably pointless. Points are sharp. I don't wanna hurt any unprepared viewers. Consular 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkesia Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Note: None of the ejections were without reason. Some were for influence reasons. Some were because Eli can't stand annoying nations. Some were for fun. Everyone who has asked me if they could return has been granted an unbanning, thus far. That doesnot mean I will hesitate to banject those same nations again, should they behave in a manner deserving such a ban. Westwind and URAP 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eli Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 yay!! URAP 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
URAP Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 yay!! I would assume the next delegate would also be willing to ban people who go too far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ike Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Note: None of the ejections were without reason. Some were for influence reasons. Some were because Eli can't stand annoying nations. Some were for fun. Everyone who has asked me if they could return has been granted an unbanning, thus far. That doesnot mean I will hesitate to banject those same nations again, should they behave in a manner deserving such a ban. This laid back style of ruling is really getting on my nerves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkesia Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 This laid back style of ruling is really getting on my nerves. How dare we have fun with a game! lol I guess you are getting on Eli's nerves too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westwind Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 This laid back style of ruling is really getting on my nerves. We could get all stuffy and serious and put you on trial for threatening the delegates's rights as defined in the bill of rights and obligations. Consular and URAP 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now